
[read Mike B's "Hallelujah" paper / read Clap Clap / read his excellent piece on Amerie and Rihanna]

[$7 digital download / swedish blog / Hello Saferide guestpost on Said the Gramophone]
Posted by Sean at June 7, 2007 12:09 PM"Aspirate gasp" is fantastic! So wonderfully onomatopoeic.
Posted by Amy at June 7, 2007 7:35 PMI'm afraid I can't hear anything but mediocrity in that Hallelujah cover.
Posted by David at June 7, 2007 11:16 PMBut surely that's part of the point, too, isn't it, David? That "Hallelujah"—or indeed, any pop song—isn't a sacred thing that must be approached (and performed) with an appropriate gravity, but a plaything, a toy to fuck around with and maybe even break?
That's the point that I took from Michael's paper when I first read it; that when a song has the weird aura of reverence around it that "Hallelujah" does—a sense that the song is somehow too important to be, y'know, fun—in that atmosphere, it takes more balls to do a tossed-off shitty version of it than to do yet another lovingly crafted, painfully earnest take on same.
Not that Michael's version is either tossed-off or shitty—but it is pretty ballsy.
Posted by Jack Fear at June 8, 2007 8:22 AMMy appreciation of both the song and the paper, for what it's worth : I agree that Buckley and Cale simplified the song, quite radically. And though I understand the logic behind the cover proposed by Michael, I find it to be another simplification (and not a really good one). An "exercice de style" as Queneau would have put it.
None of this performers (none of all performers that I heard covering this song) really give credit to the complexity and the ambivalence of Cohen's version, which makes it perhaps a bit sacred but also really more touching.
Posted by garrincha at June 8, 2007 12:22 PMActually, here "Säkert!" means something more like "Sure!" as in "I just won a million dollars!" - "Yeeeaaah, suuure!". Get it? ;)
Posted by Olle at June 10, 2007 6:12 AM